Forum > General Youth Hockey Info
Player far and above superior
Guest:
I haven't really formed an opinion on this, the people I know are vastly split, and I am curious as to how you all feel. In my area, school hockey teams are about 25% travel team kids (AA, A and B) and the rest a variety of levels- former travel, rec league etc. Teams aren't officially recognized by the school (they are technically clubs) so they aren't in yearbooks, etc. There is one school team that has a player who is on a AAA nationally ranked team, He is one of their stars and already being "looked at." Because of travel, he makes about 50% of the games, but is still the county scoring leader by a wide margin. When he is at a game, the point spread will always be at least 10, and over 90% of the goals are his. He will generally be told to stop shooting by 3rd period, but they keep him on the ice, so he plays with his opponent, "rope a dopes" them as it were. (It can be embarrassing to the other kids on the ice playing against him). I have heard that parents (and many players) on his own team prefer games when he isn't there, because then their kids get to really play. When other teams know he is playing, they don't want to play and the number of "sick" kids rises dramatically.
The kid is actually a nice kid off ice. And he is an amazing player, a beauty to watch in AAA games. But in school games, its an awful hour watching him dominate everyone on his shifts (which are almost 50% given the small rosters of most teams). So here's my question- We all know he CAN play for his school. But should he? What is in it for him? Your thoughts?
Guest:
We run into this at our MS league. While most teams are have a good number of club players, there is one team that has a Tier 1 AAA player that dominates. And he too, from what I hear, is a great kid off the ice. I hear it from parents and players, "he shouldnt play here". But he is still a kid, and he probably really enjoys playing with his friends in a low pressure environment. I say let them play. For my kids, school hockey is more of a fun time playing with friends and against some current and old teammates.
Guest:
You are looking at it the wrong way. These kids are fortunate a talented player is playing in the league. If more talented kids played in these leagues it would help all the kids.
Guest:
Its highschool hockey and unless you are in Minnesota its always been this way. There will always be at least 1 guy who dominates the league but hes not always on the best team anyway. Let them have fun its not up to the kids who plays its up to the coaches. The kids should voice their opinion to the coaching staff if its a collective argument they are all in agreement with.
Guest:
You are kidding right? Are you really suggesting that a child should not be able to play hockey with his classmates & friends because he is too good? Do you realize how silly that sounds?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page